HOME | HISTORY | BIOLOGY | CONSERVATION | YOUTH PROJECTS
VIEWING GUIDELINES
| SITE MAP | LINKS
 
 
The Future

According to the National Recovery Strategy for the Sea Otter: As the sea otter population recovers and repopulates its historic range, declines in the abundance of many invertebrates are expected. Commercial fisheries in British Columbia for invertebrate species such as sea urchins, intertidal clams and sea cucumbers will not be possible in areas with sea otters and other shellfish fisheries will be curtailed because of declines in abundance due to sea otter predation.

Besides impacting commercial fisheries, the reintroduction and subsequent protection of sea otters has forced major changes to the diets and ways of life of coastal Nuu chah nulth peoples. In many cases, these changes continue to cause extreme hardships to people who have lost, and are in the process of losing (as sea otters move into their traditional territories), a healthy and abundant traditional food source. This loss of a subsistence, and societal, resource amounts to an infringement of Aboriginal rights, specifically the Aboriginal rights to foods and resources critical to individual and societal well being. Today, sea otters have greater legal right to foods such as ?e?isi (clams), and tu´cu´p (sea urchins), than people do (S. Charleson pers. comm. 2004). Some scientists have forwarded theories about a lack of seafoods in the past, when there were lots of sea otters on the coast, and the likelihood of First Nations maintaining "otter-free" zones around particularly rich shellfish and seafood gathering areas. Neither a shortage of seafoods in the past, nor the maintenance of specific areas without sea otters, however, has been supported by the oral evidence of Nuu chah nulth elders or the anthropological and archaeological work done concerning Nuu chah nulth coastal peoples.
 
 

There are two basically opposing arguments about the uncontrolled growth of sea otter populations along the west coast of Vancouver Island. The one argument says that sea otters are a keystone species; that because they are vital to the health and restoration of nearshore ecosystems, they should be protected and allowed to repopulate without regulation. The other argument says that sea otters infringe upon human rights; that because sea otters consume large amounts of shellfish that is valuable as food for coastal communities and as an economic base for commercial shellfish gatherers, their numbers and range should be limited. How these apparently opposing arguments find reconciliation will have long-term impact on not only sea otter recovery, but also, on the well being of Vancouver Island coastal peoples and ecosystems.

Conservation page 1 | The Alaska Example

 
 
home | history | biology | conservation | human interactions | fun facts | teacher resources | youth forum stuff | sightings |
viewing guidelines | links | oceanlink | bamfield marine sciences centre | site map